• About
  • Contents
  • Tag Cloud

Temple Study

Sustaining and Defending the LDS Temple

websites

FAIR Conference 2008 Live Blog – August 8

August 8, 2008 by Bryce Haymond 4 Comments

See this link for more information.

FAIR Conference 2008 – Friday (08/08/2008) Powered by: CoveritLive
  

Close  

9:05
And we’re live.
9:06
It’s a slighty rainy day today, but we’re feeling great.
9:06
Ron Esplin is the first speaker.
9:06
His presentation is on The Joseph Smith Papers project.
9:07
putting together documentary processes like this take a long time… at least 7 years usually
9:08
eventually they will produce 2-3 volumes per year.
9:08 [Image] outside.jpg 
9:08
These materials will be able to be used for “defending” the gospel.
9:09
it will be better history about Joseph Smith and early Church beginnings.
9:09
everything about their work must be geared to the scholarly audience, if we don’t meet that audience, we’ve failed.
9:09
http://www.josephsmithpapers.org
9:10
this is a documentary editing project to provide materials to others to write about Joseph Smith.
9:10
What are the papers?
Why is it important?
How does it work?
What do we learn about Joseph Smith from it?
9:10
Elder Marlin K. Jensen – “The single most significant historical project of our generation.”
9:11
the beginnings of our Church are crucial to understand
9:12 [Image] Ron Esplin 
9:12
therefore the documents of our beginning are crucial to have available
9:13
President Hinckley – “We must know our history.”
9:13
This is a very intense project with a number of scholars involved.
9:14
This will be a “comprehensive edition of all known Joseph Smith documents.”
9:14
not everything “about” Joseph Smith… we are gathering materials from his office, the letters he wrote and received, the minutes of meetings and High Council, etc…
9:15
Why important? Make available sources of Joseph Smith life and work. Provide access to scholars of this material. Preserve the content of aging manuscripts.
9:15
[Comment From austin s]
I’m looking forward to hearing him at education week.
9:15
when scholars have the right access to documents, they use them…
9:16
will use digital images to preserve the documents also
9:16
provide more accurate texts, easier access, brings it all together in one place, puts documents into historical context, facilitates more and better scholarship
9:17
will eventually provide context in which the documents fit into the larger picture.
9:17
projects which paved the way for this project… The Papers of Thomas Jefferson… The Papers of George Washington… The Papers of Benjamin Franklin
9:18
The Papers of Benjamin Franklin was particularly valuable to Esplin in his own scholarly work.
9:20
we want to meet the documentary standard that has been laid by our predecessors on these kinds of projects… it will be of the utmost quality possible
9:20
papers projects allow us to write good history, accurate history – David McCullough
9:21
The footnotes are pure gold – much of them are masterpieces – McCullough
9:21
we want to help readers understand the documents without getting too much in the way
9:21
1. We gather the documents… 97% of it has been in possession of the Church.
9:22
other documents have been in many other places.
9:22
2. Collection, transcription, annotation.
3. Publish a volume. It is a reference work. It’s not a narrative
9:23
It won’t be bedtime reading… it is a reference
9:23
then others will write the narrative and the history books from these references
9:23
example – 1776
9:24
http://www.rootsrain.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/10/1776.jpg
9:25
Bushman’s book Rough Stone Rolling could have been even better with these Joseph Smith Papers… he had many of the documents as he is on the committee of the Papers Project, but one day someone will produce an even better biography with the use of these documents.
9:25
will offer texts and images of original documents, invites acquaintance with documents, provides resources of lessons, talks, FHE, etc.
9:25
the main effort is focused for scholars
9:26
we believe these papers will allow us to better understand our beginnings
9:26
“the scholarly audience has to drive everything”
9:27
2000+ documents, including those created by Joseph or by others at his request, those received by Joseph or kept in his office, legal matters involving Joseph
9:27
transcriptions, annotations, reference material will also be included

30 volumes expected, about 500-700 pages each.

9:27
The volume coming out this Fall is the 1830s diaries or journals
9:28
1587 total journal pages, 31 pages in Joseph’s own hand, 250 page dictated by him.
9:29
3 volumes on journals will be published
9:30
The next will be the documents series – correspondence, revelations, reports of discourses, and other documents, notices, minutes, notes, editorials
9:30
Revelations and Translations Series – 1830 Book of Mormon, for example.
9:30
Book of Commandments…
9:30
manuscript revelations will be published… behind the Book of Commandments, and D&C
9:31
History Series – approx. 7 volumes… vol 1., early efforts of Joseph Smith and others under his direction to prepare histories…
9:32
Legal & Business Series – records from 200+ judicial proceedings
9:32
example of Joseph Smith writing:
9:32 [Image] joseph smith journal.jpg 
9:33
Administrative Series – records in his office, minute books, letterbooks
9:33
How does the project work?
Collect documents… identify provenance, create transcriptions
9:33
we are being very careful to detect forgeries
9:34
[Comment From austin s]
I’m excited to hear more details about this project, but I’m hoping he’ll talk about some of the things they’ve learned or found. Or is he just planning on giving an overview of how the project is set up?
9:34
text verification – conduct three levels of text verification, using the highest technology including multi-spectral imaging and ultraviolet light
9:35
at the very end of the presentation he will explain some thing we’ve learned
9:35
things
9:36
we are being very careful to correct former mistakes in transcribing the texts.
9:37
someone once said – “I will never forgive Joseph for having a doctor as his scribe”, referring to Willard Richards… the text is sometimes hard to detect.
9:37
[Comment From austin s]
Awesome. As a non-scholar, I probably won’t ever read any of this stuff directly, but I’ll look forward to a better JS biography than RSR.
9:37
in the meantime, RSR is awesome. definitely the best biography currently available, and probably for many years to come.
9:38
source checking, copy editing (production editing), reviews both internal and external
9:38
[Comment From austin s]
Definitely, I meant to put “even better” in there 🙂
9:39
eventually everything will be available online
9:39
will get a NHPRC endorsement on this project.
9:40
http://www.archives.gov/nhprc/
9:40
dozens of people are involve din this… many have donated such as Larry Miller… student researchers, volunteers, contractors, scholars, editorial boards, etc.
9:41
Outside reviewers – Harry S. Stout, Stephen J. Stein, Mary-Jo Kline, Terryl L. Givens
9:41
will be published by The Church Historian’s Press, a new imprint for publishing authoritative works
9:42
The Joseph Smith Papers will be the first project of this press
9:42
press is important because it will earn the prestige of scholarly material
9:43
the website www.josephsmithpapers.org is a teaser site only… in a year, it will begin to offer full text and transcriptions and eventually annotations.
9:43
many reference materials will be available on the web
9:44
Bushman – “The closer you get to Joseph Smith in the sources, the stronger he will appear, rather than the reverse, as is so often assumed by critics.”
9:45
This is what we will learn about Joseph through this project…
9:45
we don’t need to defend him necessarily… we need to present him and his documents, and he will do ok
9:45
Joseph Smith was a careful, capable, and sophisticated businessman and citizen – Jeffrey N. Walker
9:46
Joseph worked better in the law than his critics. He had to live through 200 law proceedings.
9:46
Larry H. Miller has given immense funding for this project, an endowment given by them.
9:47
“Millions shall know Brother Joseph again” – Praise to the Man
9:47
[Comment From austin s]
That Bushman quote sounds great. Does he mention how much access they have to church archives and other sources? Are there some things they won’t be able to publish, or will it literally be everything that is known to exist?
9:48
They have full access to all documents… and it will all be published which fits the definition of a Joseph Smith document
9:48
Elder Jensen has emphasized over and over again that this is going to be designed for the scholars first and foremost.
9:49
we must build the scholarly core
9:49
Q&A
how do we limit bias?
9:50
we can’t expect to stand outside of ourselves… it’s probably not possible… but we can be fair-minded, and try to understand.. we can work with scholars of every persuasion as long as we can honestly look at the documents without attacking or defending one another
9:51
even things we might not like is going to be there…
9:51
we will meet scholarly standards
9:52
role of Community of Christ in this project? It is very important. They have 4-5% of the documents… around 6% is scattered across the country, and the LDS has around 90%
9:53
“I’m 64, and I intend to see all the volumes published” – Esplin
9:53
will it have an impact on curriculum materials in the Church? Yes! It already has.
9:54
the Joseph Smith manual already has reflected this, and it will be cited in the curriculum material
9:55
even future editions of the scriptures will reflect the best scholarship and manuscripts.
9:55
any major surprises? Yes, we learned many things… biggest surprise is that we thought we had 3 dozen legal cases, and we have 200+
9:56
any current Church history that will be corrected? There is so many… one detail is about D&C 107.. we don’t understand much about it
9:57
28 March 1835 has been the date… but that doesn’t work… the setting doesn’t work
9:57
if the date works, the setting doesn’t… there must be an error
9:58
28 April may be the date, but it must be before 4 May for that revelation.. but we will understand it better
9:58
will the index be cross-referenced, searchable, databased… yes, yes, yes!!
9:59
we will not have subscriptions, and it will be all there…
9:59
a documentary book is only as good as its index… three people are currently working full-time just indexing volume one.
10:00
we will learn much more about the scribes through this work
10:03
it is clear from Esplin’s presentation that this will be a landmark project in Church history… it will be unparalleled in its significance
10:04
will it include the Kirtland Egyptian papers and Book of Abraham manuscript? Yes.
10:04
the end
10:05
the next presentation will be by Matthew Brown – “The Israelite Temple and the Early Christians”
10:05
they are going to take a 10 minute break before he starts…
10:17
[Comment From KC]
Great! This one should be of particular interest to templestudy.com visitors
10:17
[Comment From Raven]
I bet you’re looking forward to Matthew Brown’s presentation, huh, Bryce?
10:17
Yes, this is going to be good. Brown is beginning now.
10:18
he is giving a brief intro of temple history throughout Israelite history
10:19
critics claim that the Israelite temple became obsolete among Christianity, but the scriptures state otherwise.
10:19
Christ taught in the temple on a daily basis, as well as his apostles.
10:19
they did not leave the temple behind… they were forcefully removed.
10:20
Paul offered prayer in the temple and received a vision of the Lord and received instruction there… the first century Christians attended the temple often.. prayed there, taught there, and worshipped there, even after the tearing of the veil during the crucifixion.
10:22
critics also believe that the kingly priests of the Mosaic system became obsolete after Christ… but this kingly priest system existed prior to the law of Moses, so there was no reason why it did not continue after Christ’s fulfillment of that law.
10:22
[Comment From lehislibrary.wordpress]
The scriptures cited are Mark 14:48-49; Acts 2:44,46; Acts 5:19-20,42
10:22
John described the heavenly temple, which has direct parallels with the Tabernacle.
10:23
Brown talks fast too…
10:24
Christians clearly continued to believe in the temple after the crucifixion.
10:24
Were the early Christians tied to the Israelite initiation system?
10:24
Christ made us kings and priests unto God… in John’s book of Revelations.
10:26
the offices of king and priest were physically bestowed upon Christians… based on the book of Revelations
10:26
1. eat of the tree of life in paradise (Rev. 2:7)
10:27
those who have access to the holy of holies city will become like Adam and Eve and act like they did in the Garden of Eden.
10:28
2. Not hurt by the Second Death (Rev. 2:11)
10:28
kings and priests will not be affected by the second death.. they will serve in the presence of God.
10:29
Rev. 21:12 – angels stand to guard the gates of the temple
10:30
bells attached to the robe of the high priest announced the presence of the priest… he struck some sound producing object… he asked to enter into the sanctuary of God
10:30
kings and priests took part in purification rites
10:30
3. Eat of the hidden manna (Rev. 2:17).. which was hidden inside of the ark of the covenant inside the holy of holies.
10:31
Christ is the bread of life… manna as a symbol of the Savior.
10:32
4. receive a new name (Rev. 2:17)… royal accession
10:34
Jacob’s wrestling with an angel:
10:34 [Image] Jacob’s wrestling.jpg 
10:34
[Comment From BHodges]
ill bet you love this one
10:34
it was actually more of an embrace.
10:34
5. Given power over the nations.
10:34
6. Receive the Morning Star (Rev. 2:28)
10:35
this is incredible stuff!
10:35
7. Received white raiment (Rev. 3:5)
10:36
the high priest was dressed in holy linen coat, and linen breeches, a linen girdle, and a linen mitre. Lev. 16:4
10:36
8. Name not blotted from the Book of Life (Rev. 3:5)
10:37
9. Made a pillar in the temple, never leave (Rev. 3:12)
10:37
the person becomes a permanent part of the temple
10:37
the king will be a priest “forever”
10:38
10. Name of God and New Jerusalem (Rev. 3:12)… the name of God was written on the forehead of the high priest.
10:39
11. Seated upon Christ’s throne (Rev. 3:21)
10:39
deification for the Saint who is allowed to sit in this chair.
10:40
Solomon sat upon the throne of the Lord as king.
10:40
12. Adoption and Inheritance (Rev. 21:7)
10:40
all-incompassing inheritance… the king was adopted by deity.. the sonship of the king was a divine guarantee of his power and authority
10:41
did the early Christians view this connection with ancient temple rites in allegorical or liturgical form?
10:42
we can look at the liturgical practices of the early Christians to see
10:42
Margaret Barker – The Great High Priest: The tTemple Roots of Christian Liturgy
10:42
Margaret Barker – Temple Themes in Christian Worship
10:43
Christian terms used in the documents which parallel temple terms.
10:43
the liturgy took place in a building that was referred to as a temple and contained a holy of holies.
10:43
they were compared with Adam in paradise
10:43
priesthood and kingship were taught to the early Christian initiates
10:44
Anointing ceremony in early Christian liturgy.
10:44
[Comment From Federico]
Ciao
10:45
Investiture in early Christian liturgy… the initiate received a white garment after baptism.
10:45
called the “glorious robe that Adam lost.”
10:46
“garments of glory” or “garments for glory”
10:46
Ephod – identified as a sort of apron tied around the waist, embroidered with colored threads.
10:47
early Christian cemetery in Egypt has many many corpses being discovered wearing aprons
10:48
BYU Studies article by Griggs on the dig.
10:48
Gammadia marks found on the garments of early Christians in textiles, and artwork.
10:49
meaning of the marks is not understood by scholars, but one has recently postulated that it might be related to the kingship of Jesus Christ… Christ also has gammadia marks on his robe.
10:49
gammadia marks on the tunics of Coptic Christians
10:49
Same mark depicted on the veil..
10:49
cosmological markings were also on the veil of the temple in Jerusalem at the time of Jesus Christ.
10:50
Byzantine Veil in Greece with gammadia marks
10:51
compass and square depicted with temple priests… the right angle tool is a symbol of righteousness.
10:51
artwork showing Christ enthrone holding a compass over the elements of Creation.
10:52
Prov. 8:27 – God using a compass or inscribing a circle upon the face of the depth
10:54
the right-handed clasp is found among ancient artwork… being admitted through the gate of paradise.
10:55
right-handed clasp between God and the king is part of the Israelite practice
10:55
Modern Eastern Orthodox Christians continue temple architecture and liturgy
10:56
Eastern Orthodox churches are very similar to the structure of Solomon’s temple or the Tabernacle
10:57
including anointing oil, holy of holies “choir”, curtain “iconostasis”, garden of eden “vestibule”, earth “nave”, open-air forecourt
10:57
nave – vestibule – holy of holies
10:57
three ascending degrees.
10:58
Brown is giving the description of modern Orthodox ceremony I believe.
10:59
including new names, investiture, question and answers, headress, embracing, apron with symbols of Adam and paradise, renouncing the world.
11:00
conclusion – the evidence shows that the temple symbols, liturgy, vestments, etc., were clealry part of the early Christians
11:00
Q&A session
11:01
November 7th is the symposium at BYU about the temple… many different temple themes are going to be presented.
11:02
What is the symbolism behind the horn-shaped oil container? symbol of kingly power… like the horns of a bull… Ephraim’s blessing of the horns pushing the people together
11:02
why leather for the aprons? prophets vestments were made out of sheep skins and goat skins.
11:03
when is your book coming out?
11:04
Dan Brown is coming out with a book on Solomon’s temple, and Matthew has been asked to deal with some of those issues..
11:04
support the BYU symposium on the temple in November
11:04
we should understand these things… learn about the temple throughout the scriptures, it will help you as a Latter-day Saint.
11:04
the end
11:05
that was absolutely incredible!
11:05
way to go Br. Brown!
11:06
[Comment From Guest]
they has his ppt notes on the stream
11:06
it would be nice if they made all these PowerPoints available on the FAIR website.
11:07
or if someone who is on the stream would make them available to others.
11:07
by the way, this is what Matthew Brown looks like:
11:07 [Image] Matthew Brown 
11:07
[Comment From Hans]
hold on, I am getting fair to email them to me
11:08
[Comment From austin s]
do you have to register for that temple symposium at byu in november? or where can I get more information?
11:08
if they are making them available on the live stream, then they should also post them online
11:09
I don’t think you have to register for the symposium… let me find the link for more information… hold just one second
11:11
[Comment From Hans]
they just uploaded the ppt for the next lecture
11:12
[Comment From austin s]
Hans, did they upload that ppt on the live stream or to their website?
11:14
the BYU symposium is by the organization Students of the Ancient Near East (SANE). It will be held on November 7th. For more information see the user “maklelan” on the MADB website.

http://kennedy.byu.edu/academic/anes/sane.php

11:14
[Comment From Hans]
on the live stream
11:14
the next presentation is by Newell Bringhurst and Craig Foster – “The White Horse Prophecy: Myth vs. Reality”
11:15 [Image] Newell Bringhurst 
11:15 [Image] Craig Foster 
11:15
Bringhurst is at the mic.
11:16
booklength study – “Mormon Quest for the Presidency”
11:16
http://www.johnwhitmerbooks.com/books/details_MQP.asp
11:17
the white horse prophecy is a mystery
11:17
[Comment From gary]
what does MADB stand for?
11:17
Mormon Apologetics and Discussion Board (MADB)
11:18
the white horse prophecy always comes up in the runs for presidency of Mormon candidates.
11:19
lol… Scott Gordon brought them kicking and screaming into the 21st century with the PowerPoint presentation
11:20
one of the most controversial revelations is the white horse prophecy
11:20
and elderly member of the Church is the one who gave a copy of the prophecy
11:20
Rushton
11:21
Edwin Rushton
11:22
manifest strong millinarianism
11:22
primary message great confusion, wickedness, revolution in the end times before the Second Coming
11:22
4 horses of Revelations
11:24
4 major groups of people – 1. White horse-Latter-day Saints. Will establish Zion. Become rich and powerful. 2. Pale – non-Mormon European decent. Honest in heart will be gathered to Zion in safety. 3. Red – possibly American Indians.. powerful group. 4. Black – people of African ancestry.
11:25
constitution and government of U.S. will be in jeopardy – hanging by a thread as fine as silk fiber.. if it were to break then it would be the end of the government… but it will be saved by the combined actions of the White horse and the Red horse.
11:26
the occasion of the prophecy? following an event in which Joseph Smith reviewed the Nauvoo Legion. He gave a toast in which he rebuked the enemies of the Church… then he goes into the prophecy
11:26
LDS response through the years has been mixed – the constitution would hang by a thread
11:27
many General Authorities have used the metaphor
11:27
Brigham Young – will the constitution be destroyed? No! It will be held inviolate by this people. As JS has said ‘the time will come when the destiny of the nation will hang by a thread, at that time this people will save it from destruction”
11:28
when it hangs by a thread, the elders will have to be called to save it
11:28
Joseph F. Smith – JS was inspired to ratify this truth, predicted the time when the constitution would hang by a thread, and the LDS would come to deliver us
11:29
GA’s continue to affirm the veracity of JS’s prophecy
11:30
Harold B. Lee- time would come when the constitution would hang by a thread, and the elders would come forward and save it from destruction… why us? we know by revelation how the constitution came into being, and we know the destiny of this nation by revelation
11:31
Ezra Taft Benson – repeatedly referred to the dangers proposed to the constitution… this people will come forward and save the constitution..
11:31
LDS leaders have strongly denounced most other elements of the white horse prophecy
11:32
it is “ridiculous, and a lot of trash” as reported by some prophets
11:33
“it was never spoken by the prophet in the manner they have put forth”
11:33
Elder McConkie – “a false and deceptive document that has cropped up again and again for over a century”
11:34
the white horse prophecy has never been accepted as binding prophecy by the Latter-day Saints
11:39
talk about Mitt Romney fulfilling 160 year old premonition of the white horse prophecy
11:40
Mitt – it is not official Church doctrine.. there is lot of speculation that is not Church doctrine
11:42
the white horse prophecy has been rejected by every Church leader who has talked about it.
11:42
Q&A Session
11:44
why would you classify yourself as a “renegade” Mormon?
11:44
the odd-couple of Mormon studies… Craig is a very conservative, card-carrying, active, serving member… Bringhurst is a liberal, Democrat, cultural Mormon
11:45
Bringhurst proud of his Mormon ancestry
11:45
he not an orthodox, regular attending, Latter-day Saint
11:46
what are the findings you’ve found particularly? it is so pervasive.. there are 30 different versions
11:46
the provenance of the document seems to be a product of the late nineteenth century, and does not reflect the worldview of Joseph Smith in 1843
11:47
it received even wider acknowledgement even after prophets denounced it.
11:48
Foster – this stuff seems to be passed on by missionaries..
11:48
Mormon-missionary culture… fun sounding prophecies and stories
11:50
[Comment From Hans]
like elder nelson and the guy who translated the BoM into Arabic
11:50
yup
11:52
the thread statement was a separate element from the rest of the prophecy
11:52
first quoted by Brigham Young
11:52
the idea of the constitution being in peril already had some establishment before the date of this prophecy
11:53
it was probably incorporated into the white horse prophecy to give it legitimacy – Foster
11:54
may not the constitution be waving in the wind by a thread? we are facing many problems today… depends on your worldview
11:54
things always look worse than they really are
11:56
Bringhurst – I’m optimistic
11:56
why do you think this white horse prophecy refuses to die?
11:57
Foster – 1. we look at what’s going on and we like to dig up things
11:57
it is human nature to try to explain things and put our circumstances in a framework
11:58
prophecy has incorporated legitimate comments of what could happen to the constitution… so it has an air of legitimacy
11:58
Mormon folklore… rumors…
11:59
[Comment From BHodges]
www.mormontwinkies.blogspot.com
11:59
nice!
12:08
lunchtime
1:13
ok… we’re coming back now
1:13
John Lynch is going to do FAIR Business.. not sure what that means
1:15
talking about the mission of FAIR
1:15
FAIR is not a mouthpiece for the Church
1:17
FAIR does not speak for the Brethren… if they say that what FAIR is doing is wrong, then they would shut down
1:17
FAIR doesn’t define the Church’s doctrine
1:17
FAIR doesn’t debate
1:18
FAIR’s audience is members of the Church who come on some information that they have a question about
1:18
FAIR helps defend the Church by making information available to members
1:19
FAIR is not a replacement for personal study
1:19 [Image] conference room.jpg 
1:19
FAIR is not involved in anything political
1:20
FAIR aspires to be a resource to the membership of the Church
1:27
ok… we were offline for a minute… but we’re back
1:27
FAIR wants to protect your heart for the right to have faith

we feel that our participation in FAIR is in a small part a fulfillment of our covenant we make in the temple to defend the Church and kingdom

1:27
[Comment From austin s]
And I think they do a great job at achieving that goal.
1:28
FAIR works on a budget of about $35,000/year… almost everything that is done in the organization is by volunteer work.
1:30
John Taylor Defender of the Faith Award
1:30
YouTube to sow seeds of faith
1:31
one individual has been crucial in entering that medium of videos
1:31
Tyler Livingston
1:32
http://www.youtube.com/user/fairldsorg
1:32
[Comment From Hans]
I didn’t know Lance was an immigration attorney. Small world!
1:33
Scott Gordon – “Online Apologetics” – is the next presentation
1:34
President of FAIR
1:34
www.fairlds.org
1:35
Elder Ballard has called on members of the Church to be more active online talking about the Church, and in telling others about their faith.
1:36
history of FAIR, his experiences with the organization
1:37
Elder Ballard – we are living in a world saturated with all kinds of voice… far too many people have a poor understanding of the Church… media reports often driven by controversies… may I ask you to join the conversation by participating on the Internet… and explain in simple, clear terms the message of the Restoration
1:37
start a blog – download videos and share them, write to media sites and voice your views on the accuracy of the reports
1:37
requires you to understand the basic, fundamental principles of the gospel
1:38
Gordon often finds LDS members making statements that just aren’t true
1:38
statements on evolution or the 7000 year earth history are not Church doctrine
1:39
critics and dissidents believed that the Church has hidden its history
1:39
the Church has hidden these things… in the Ensign
1:40
Internet definitions
1:40
website, chatroom, message board, blog, e-list, wiki, social networking, YouTube, trolling, lurker
1:41
we’ve got some syncrhonous communication going right here, right now!!
1:41
this is a blending of chatroom and blog… fun isn’t it?
1:42
the growth of blogs is exploding online
1:43
FAIR wiki – http://en.fairmormon.org/Main_Page
1:44
www.lds.net
1:44
http://www.youtube.com/user/fairldsorg
1:45
trolling – someone who posts controversial comments to bate others into an emotional response… its not to engage in conversation or discussion
1:45
lurker – someone who reads things, lurking in the shadows, rarely post comments
1:45
history of FAIR
1996-1997 AOL Message Boards
1:46
decided to pool efforts and make a website to post answers to issues
1:47
FAIR was created to create a repository of answers, share information, discuss Mormonism online, not let anti-Mormonism to take control online, sell books on the subject
1:47
[Comment From Hans]
controversy attracts people?
1:48
they have tried not to debate… FAIR provides information
1:48
divested themselves of the Message Board
1:48
so now the message board is a separate thing from FAIR – www.mormonapologetics.org
1:49
Topical Guide – www.fairlds.org/apol/
1:49
Bookstore – http://store.fairlds.org/
1:51
FAIR Journal – http://www.fairlds.org/pubs/
1:51
Blacklds.org is a FAIR website
1:52
there is some great and faithful black Americans and black members of the LDS Church… from today’s standards, there was racism within the Church, just as in all denominations, Black Americans have been treated dishonorably
1:53
FAIR wiki – www.fairmormon.org
1:53
some of FAIR’s best work… contains LOTS of information
1:54
Joseph Smith DVD – point by point response
1:54
http://en.fairmormon.org/Search_for_the_Truth_DVD
1:54
FAIR blog – www.fairblog.org
1:55
FAIR on YouTube – http://www.youtube.com/user/fairldsorg
1:55
Ask the Apologist on the website – goes out to the FAIR list…
1:55
many hundreds of questions are answered here
1:56
what have I learned in FAIR?
1:56
2 different types of anti-Mormonism:
1. Evangelical Anti-Mormonism
1:56
Boundary Maintenance
1:57
issues they bring up, becoming Gods, Trinity, Different Jesus, Jesus Satan’s brother, Prophets, Bible Inerrancy, Faith/Grace, Polytheism, etc…..
1:57
far more effective on members is Secular Anti-Mormonism by ex-Mormons
1:58
issues they bring up on polygamy, DNA, looking into hat, Masonry, Kinderhook plates, Book of Abraham, Blacks and Priesthood, Treatment of women/gays, etc…
1:58
“Joseph Smith was a False Prophet because….” is the most popular attack on the Church
1:59
Loss of faith because – if we have the “plan of happiness,” then why am I not happy,
the church is true unless I get a boyfriend/girlfriend
I just want to fit in
I am feeling Depression
I am shocked by what I just read
No success can compensate, and I failed
Word of Wisdom/other problems
2:00
If they say they have one question, they usually have several
by the time they talk to you, they have already decided but want to prepare people for their decision
some just want to know there is an answer; others want details of that answer
2:02
some have the gift of believing, others have the gift of having speculation and of needing more information
2:03
to be cautious online NOTE:
There are “exit counselors” who are there to lead you out… many of these are LDS… they are members… they want you to embrace their view of the Church.. that it isn’t true, but just a nice club to belong to [reminds me of a recent post I wrote]
2:03
Beware of these… beware of Anti-Mormon narratives and from passing them on
2:05
These are FALSE:
* No peer review at Maxwell Institute
* BYU scholars are not recognized
* People leave the Church if they become more educated
* It is bad to be an Apologist – they aren’t “objective”
* FAIR is “mean” and engage in Ad-Hominem attacks
* I left the church because of FARMS/FAIR
2:06
here is Bryce’s recent post on the “exit counselors” that I have encountered – http://templestudy.com/2008/08/06/the-grossest-form-of-church-criticism/
2:09
here is a fuzzy photo of Scott Gordon speaking:
2:09 [Image] scott gordon.jpg 
2:10
[Comment From Alberto Barrios]
I’m following the conference since yesterday great job, I’m in Bucaramanga- satander – colombia and I’m in charge of a branch of the foundation here in my country, I hopr some day we can have a conference like this one in spanish for our latin community. god bless you
2:13
Thank you Alberto for participating. The Conference is always growing, and FAIR is always expanding, and being published in many different languages. I’m sure it will continue to grow in the years ahead.
2:14
has apologetics helped? Gordon is giving examples.
2:15
for one, who is not a Mormon, apologetics gave her the faith to believe in God… particularly through the work of C.S. Lewis
2:16
she prayed and received an answer that God was there…. apologetics got her on that road to even begin to pray
2:17
Mormon apologetics got her to read the Book of Mormon, and she knows it has God’s fingerprints on it.
2:18
another person was baptized in 2001, previously agnostic, many things about God seemed really incredible…
2:19
she found FAIR, and some FAIR volunteers helped answer her questions
2:19
apologetics created that environment for the seed (Alma 32) to take a place
2:19
“dare to hope that it is true”
2:20
intelligent apologetics gave plausible explanations for difficulties, and gave room for the seed of faith to grow
2:20
Gordon – we need you!!
2:21
take a part in the Church online.. we need people to link to FAIR www.fairlds.org, and leave positive comments and rate the videos on YouTube
2:21
if you really want to help, stop commenting and linking to bad blogs and YouTube videos… that drives up their ratings
2:21
we need people to help translate into other languages
2:22
we also need to have people donate to help with funding
2:22
Elder Ballard said – “remember who you are”
2:23
Q&A session
2:23
how widespread is leaving the Church? it is more public, they post about it, don’t know percentages
2:24
what is the relationship between FAIR and the Maxwell Institute? We support each other.. encouragement, information, etc… mostly just friends
2:24
[Comment From David Larsen]
I wonder which blogs he considers to be bad ones? I might have to review my links!
2:24
good question!
2:25
10 minute break before the next speaker
2:25
next Brian Hauglid will be speaking on “The Book of Abraham”
2:25
[Comment From Hans]
hopefully not mine
2:25
lol… you do good Hans 🙂
2:27
what about mine?
2:27
Do you like TempleStudy.com
Yes

 ( 60% )

No

 ( 20% )

Some

 ( 0% )

Hate it!!

 ( 20% )

2:28
[Comment From SteveS]
Gordon seemed to have a broad view of what constitutes attacks on faith-promoting materials.
2:34
[Comment From David Larsen]
You guys are both great
2:36
[Comment From David Larsen]
I really love the interviews with Margaret Barker that you’ve posted.
2:36
Thanks David! I’ve got three more parts that I will post later tonight.
2:37
ok, we are on to Brian Hauglid on the Book of Abraham.
2:37
by the way, Scott Gordon looks like this:

2:37 [Image] Scott Gordon 
2:38
Here is Brian Hauglid:
2:38 [Image] Brian Hauglid 
2:38
[Comment From David Larsen]
Hauglid is awesome.
2:38
“Helping those with questions about the Book of Abraham”
2:39
Book of Abraham is a club that is often used on our heads
2:39
how to deal with these questions…
2:40
Hauglid really likes the material that FAIR produces… they do a great job of producing good things
2:40
[Comment From BHodges]
I voted democrat
2:40
lol
2:40
critics say that Joseph made up the Book of Abraham
2:41
[Comment From David Larsen]
Wish I could make up something that good for my blog
2:41
Book of Abraham manuscripts are not the originals
2:42
we don’t work in a vacuum
2:42
a few observations on how we can conduct conversations on the Book of Abraham
2:42
likes to sit down eye-to-eye and discuss the book
2:43
Bushman Seminar 2008… 10 people who gathered to research Joseph Smith and his critics… we weren’t trying to recreate the wheel on apologetics
2:44
all agreed that we are trying to work with our neighbors, friends, family members, those who have tough questions… a more “pastoral approach” focused on the members not on the critics
2:44
especially those who were not already almost out the door
2:44
some people tried to get help from FAIR/FARMS, but didn’t for some reason… tried to research that
2:45
when people get buried in anti-Mormon literature they start losing trust in their feelings..
2:45
can I believe what I’ve felt in the past…
2:46
those who work through it, with help from apologists, who talk to the right kinds of people, DO work through it, and are stronger for it…
2:46
autobiographical experience
2:48
when he was young he received a spiritual impression, before he was a member of the Church, that God loved him… so he opened the NT and began to read
2:49
read Lund’s book “The Coming of the Lord”
2:49
liked what he read… wanted more – Elder McConkie’s Doctrinal New Testament
2:50
met with the missionaries, and was eventually baptized
2:50
his parents were upset with him..
2:51
got a home teacher.. on his first and only visit he gave a great discussion of 2 Kings..
2:52
liked him… later saw him reading a PlayBoy.. that was hard to see
2:52
[Comment From Hans]
stepped away for a few minutes. bryce, your blog is great!
2:52
Thanks Hans! I really appreciate it.
2:52
the Lord was testing him…
2:53
Bishop Anderson met with Hauglid and said “you might as well know now that the Church is not a haven for saints but a hospital for sinners”

2:53
learning the “real” Church history…
2:53
but he stayed in the faith and worked through it… one-on-one discussions with people
2:54
another story…. Group on Islam… guy came up to him asked him about Book of Abraham… “how can you stay a member of the Church with what you know about the book?”
2:55
this guy decided the Church wasn’t true over the book and other things he found online… Hauglid visited with him some, but he could tell that he was already further along than he could help him.
2:55
[Comment From David Larsen]
got to go..keep up good work, Bryce!
2:55
he brought up the “problems” of the Book of Abraham
1. papyri was used to make the book
2. papyri doesn’t say what the book says
how do you reconcile that?
2:56
same ol’ story
2:57
Haudlid told him, you know what, I’m not converted to the method or the history… I’m converted to the gospel of Jesus Christ… I separate the two
2:57
the internet is not accurate most of the time about the Book of Abraham
2:57
it is twisted and turned to try to show Joseph wasn’t a true prophet… this plants seeds of doubt in people
2:58
the more they read it the more Joseph turns into a fraud.. but there is another side to the story that they don’t deliver.. sometimes information is put there to intentionally misguide people
2:58
what do we do about this?
2:59
Suggestions about what to do.. face-to-face
2:59
1. treat the person with respect
2:59
on the web, its really hard to do because you have the whole range of people… but one-on-one it is easier to do
3:00
help them know that the questions they are asking does not place them in the “bad” Mormon category
3:00
we are willing to listen to even tough questions
3:01
sometimes we are so anxious to answer the question that we forget to listen to what the person is saying
3:01
especially when it is a sincere question
3:01
it is usually very personal to them
3:02
lift of the heads that hang down, and strengthen the feeble knees
3:02
“as all have not faith, teach one another”
3:03
treat questions seriously
3:10
WiFi dropped again for a couple minutes
3:10
we need to treat sincere questions seriously, or we can offend
3:11
sometimes we have to admit that critics are sometimes right
3:11
“now let’s talk about what that might mean…”
3:12
for example, for over 100 years, members thought the Kinderhook plates were authentic
3:13
but then they were showed to be frauds… so it is possible for us to not believe in things correctly
3:15
what does it mean if Joseph Smith translated some of the Kinderhook plates?
1. he may have believed that the plates were right, but no inspiration came, so he gave his own interpretation…. but no inspiration came
2. maybe he looked at them more like a scholarly pursuit.
3. maybe its both
3:16
we can take the same approach with Book of Abraham… clearly the papyri we have today, facsimile 1, does not contain the text of the Book of Abraham
3:18
what about the manuscripts and the Egyptian characters?
3:18
the simplest explanation that Joseph was a fraud is the hardest conclusion to come to…
3:19
these are challenges and mysteries, but they don’t affect my testimony
3:20
we should focus IN the Book of Abraham, not necessarily at the Book of Mormon.. what it says is much more a testimony of its truth
3:20
[Comment From SteveS]
huh?
3:21
for example, we have great historical context that works great with the text of the Book of Abraham.. the families, the locations, the context
3:21
the Book of Abraham fits perfectly into an ancient setting
3:22
historically, we are doing very well with the text of the book… doctrinally, we are also doing very well
3:22
the best way to help members is to work with them face-to-face
3:23
treat them with respect and with seriousness
3:23
admit good arguments from critics… there is more to the book than from its origins.. the text has historical and doctrinal treasures
3:23
Q&A session
3:24
next volume – Book of Abraham manuscripts, reference
3:24
all this may one day be in one of the volumes of the Joseph Smith Papers
3:25
missing scroll theory? Abraham 1:12?
3:27
hmmm… I’m not sure what to think of Hauglid’s approach
3:28
not sure I agree with it
3:28
ok, this I agree with… we can know things better by a spiritual conviction than by rational investigation
3:30
he thinks that Abraham 1:12 might be an addition or inclusion by Joseph Smith
3:30
first time I’ve heard that theory
3:30
the end
3:31
looks like we have a snack break now til 3:45
3:31
we’ll be back
3:32 [Standby]  back at 3:45pm
3:56
alrighty. We’re only as good as our WiFi here… apologies.
3:56
Brant Gardner is speaking now. “Mormon’s Editorial Method and Meta-Message”
3:56
Gardner wants to get into the head of Mormon, the great editor
3:57
Mormon’s Outline… he must have outlined a basic structure for his abridgement, given the headnotes given by Mormon
3:58
Repetitive Resumption
3:59
when Mormon includes editorial statement saying one thing, and then later coming back and saying the same thing again
4:00
Mormon followed his outline
4:01
Mormon’s Sources and the Construction of His Text: Book Names
4:01
what came from the source plates and what came from him?
4:01
the book names themselves tell us they were original with the plates and not with Mormon’s editing
4:02
the lost 116 pages from the book of Lehi
4:03
Mormon’s original book included Lehi, Mosiah, Alma, Helaman, 3 Nephi, 4 Nephi, Mormon
4:04
the book we have today is not what Mormon intended us to have…
4:05
the change in book names indicates a shift in ruling lines
4:08
this is deep… Gardner knows just a bit about the Book of Mormon
4:09
how did Joseph Smith figure all of this out, if he put it together as our critics suggest?
4:09
chapter divisions
4:09
Joseph saw divisions, but not numbers… must have been Mormon’s conceptual breaks
4:10
when the chapter changes, we have a picture of Mormon’s mind
4:11
Mormon makes a new chapter at the beginning of a new sermon, or end of sermon
4:11
1830 edition shows the chapters as dictated.
4:12
Orson Pratt fixed in 1879 what he thought were better chapter breaks, but that is not what Mormon originally thought
4:13
the sermons were direct quotations… since they were a shift in source, there was a chapter break for Mormon
4:13
Textual Flow Indicators
4:14
all punctuation was added in our day
4:15
“and it came to pass” and “and now” were two markers which guided textual flow
4:15
the former marks the movement of time… the latter marks the movement in concept
4:16
the chapters which have “and it came to pass” show much historical flow… “now it came to pass” shows both time and concept change
4:17
it’s amazing Joseph Smith used these two textual markers flawlessly
4:18
there are Mesoamerican glyphs which can be translated as “and it came to pass” and “and now” or “and thus”
4:18
Mormon’s Interaction with His Material
4:19
How faithful was he to his sources? How good was he as a historian?
4:19
he reproduced sermons faithfully… when he was creating his own narrative, how good was he? he was very much like the historians of antiquity.. he told a moral story, not necessarily a story of facts.
4:22
this will be a good read when published… Gardner is giving a lot of details within the text of the Book of Mormon
4:22
which point to the editing of Mormon, and his reasons for doing certain things like quoting vs. narrating
4:25
Mormon’s understanding of his task was appropriately ancient… he saw all events as they supported his religious understanding… recasted everything into a moral history… to convince all that Jesus is the Messiah
4:26
Mormon didnt write to convince us that Jesus’s doctrine was true, he wrote to convince us the Jesus is the Messiah
4:26
4 Nephi is Mormon’s intentional book about nothing
4:27
the people were all converted unto the Lord
4:28
“they lived happily ever after”
4:31
Mormon’s Use of Time
4:32
Mormon marks empty years
4:33
intentionally… these were place holders into a pattern… from history into story
4:33
using the space symbolically
4:35
sometimes I think these presentations are more comprehensible on paper than spoken. 🙂
4:36
it is certainly deep, and detailed, showing the editorializing of Mormon for intentional purposes
4:37
something that Joseph could clearly not have remotely thought about… the details of Mormon’s thought were much too intricate.
4:37
historical pattern – descent into apostasy, gadianton combinations, destruction of Nephite polity, The Messiah comes
4:38 [Image] Brant Gardner 
4:38
this pattern reoccurs… darkness before light
4:39
Mormon’s optimistic message was that the Messiah WILL come!
4:39
Q&A Session
4:39
what was sealed in Ether?
4:41
How were the records arranged physically in the plates?
4:41
regardless of where they were, they were translated precisely where they needed to be.
4:42
how do chapter breaks correlate with chiasmus? not really sure, not the one to ask.
4:42
age of Alma the Younger when the angel visited him? Don’t know.
4:43
Mormon’s use of Captain Moroni? Mormon really liked Captain Moroni
4:46
do you accept the Arnold Friberg translation of the Book of Mormon? (laughter)
4:48
this is an ancient book! Mormon put this together in a very specific way! it was a remarkable work to give us what we have today! imagine the time it took him to put it together. The most important lesson, that Jesus is the Christ.
4:48
the end
4:49
the next presentation is by Dan Peterson – “Humble Apologetics”
4:50 [Image] Daniel Peterson 
4:52
Peterson’s thoughts on the subject…
4:53
these things are not new… they’ve already been said during the Conference.
4:53
“Humble Apologetics” – I’m a model for that… lol
4:54
named after a book called “Humble Apologetics”
6:44
well, I’m sorry we missed Br. Peterson’s remarks
6:45
the WiFi went down at about 4:55pm, and they weren’t able to get it back up to my knowledge..
6:46
so sorry for that…
6:46
basically Dan Peterson’s message was that we don’t know everything, we don’t claim to know everything, and we shouldn’t act like we know everything
6:47
Even Nephi admitted he didn’t know why God did certain things in certain ways
6:47
We should remember why we do apologetics.. it isn’t to argue
6:48
arguing with people who do not care about understanding will get us nowhere
6:49
Peterson had some great comments on all of this, and many stories which were great to hear.
6:49
So, I hope you liked the liveblog. I hope it was beneficial to you. And thanks for participating.
6:50
Goodbye folks.
6:50



Posted in: Tidbits Tagged: apologetics, bloggernacle, blogging, conference, fair, online, websites

FAIR Conference 2008 Live Blog – August 7

August 7, 2008 by Bryce Haymond 3 Comments

See this link for more information.

FAIR Conference (08/07/2008) Powered by: CoveritLive
  

Close  

8:53 [Image] exposition center.jpg 
8:54
Well, here we are. About 10 minutes before the FAIR Conference starts. This is a picture of the outside of the South Towne Exposition Center in Sandy, Utah, on August 7th, 2008.
8:54
They have a sign out front that looks like this:
8:54 [Image] fair sign.jpg 
8:55
This is what the empty Conference hall looked like when I arrived around 8:00am this morning:
8:55 [Image] conference hall.jpg 
8:56
As you can see, they’ve got a stand at the front, with two screens set up on either side.
8:56
The hall is big enough to fit several hundred people.
8:56
Here is a close-up of the stand:
8:56 [Image] stand.jpg 
8:58
You can see on the stand that they have a podium, and a table with 3 mics. I’m guessing that this will be used for the panel discussion with Blake Ostler’s philosophy presentation.
8:59
And here is a picture of little ol’ me, having a great time here at the FAIR Conference.
8:59 [Image] bryce.jpg 
9:00
I’ve already met some people that I’ve only conversed with online. I said hi to Mike Parker from FAIR, and Kerry Shirts (the Backyard Professor), and Reed Russell. It’s great to put a face with a name.
9:02
I’ve also met Hannah Rebekah, who is sitting right next to me. She’s commented here before on TempleStudy.com I think.
9:03
They’ve said prayer, and Scott Gordon is making opening remarks. Turn off cell phones, restrooms, etc.
9:03
Will introduce each speaker, turn time over to speaker, and then have a Q&A afterwards. 3×5 cards will be passed out into the audience during the presentation and later be given to the speaker to answer after their presentation.
9:04
Announcing the bookstore online, and a lot of materials that they also have for sale here at the Conference.
9:04
“We are really not good at raising money” says Scott Gordon.
9:05
Looking for people to help raise funds for FAIR.
9:05
[Comment From James]
The live audio streaming is not working!! Do they know that??
9:06
I don’t know if they know if the live audio streaming is not working. You’ll have to contact them. I’m sitting about 5-6 people away from the tech guys.
9:10
[Comment From Raven]
Are there many people in attendance?
9:11
There are several hundred people here.
9:11
Sorry for the lag… they bumped me off the wireless access for several minutes, so I missed Gordon’s comments for a few minutes there as I got reconnected.
9:11
[Comment From James]
Oh it just started working!!
9:12
Good! I think there is a couple minute lag time for the live audio stream.
9:12
Mike Ash has been introduced and is not introducing his book, “Shaken Faith Syndrome.”
9:12 [Image] Mike Ash 
9:13
er… he is “now” introducing his book… see, I’m going to have spelling mistakes as we go here.
9:13
He is continuing to introduce his book.
http://www.shakenfaithsyndrome.com/
9:13
[Comment From BHodges]
A lot of folks here today.
9:14
Is this many more people than have attended in the past, Blair? Where you sitting, anyway?
9:15
Ash is explaining the term “syndrome.”
9:16
The definitions from Dictionary.com
9:16
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/syndrome
9:17
[Comment From BHodges]
I think there are more than last year, and a lot more women. I am on the second row on the left side.
9:17
Cool. I’m on the third row on the very right hand side.
9:17
“Shaken Faith” from the term applied to those who shake babies…
9:18
[Comment From BHodges]
Ash is saying Shaken Faith syndrome is not a disease, it is the result of the actions of another trying to hurt or damage. plus it was catchy.
9:18
Ash saying some words about “What is Doubt?”
9:20
When we encounter information that conflicts with our firm convictions about something, we have a strange feeling… like buyers remorse
9:20
Cognitive Dissonance – thoughts in disharmony
9:21
this creates intellectual, physical, and emotional discomfort
9:22
sometimes we make up excuses to help relieve cognitive dissonance
9:22
the level of discomfort is in proportion to the amount of conviction you have
9:24
the weight of our different convictions
9:24
the weight of our convictions
9:25
[Comment From Patrick]
Does Ash agree with your recent post, Bryce, that those with “shaken faith” only stay in the church for “social reasons” and are in a state of “pure apostasy”?
9:26
we can 1. reject the new information as “false”
9:26 [Standby]  be back in a sec
9:27
we can 2. reject the new information as “unimportant”
9:28
patrick – my post was not about those with “shaken faith” but with those who purposefully choose to not follow the authorities of the church, and lead others to believe the same way.
9:30
our critics believe that faithful members tend to choose the less rational approaches to address issues
9:31
we can 3. Change our cognitions or beliefs
9:32
[Comment From James]
It sounds like a summary of the first couple chapters of his book, which is excellent by the way!
9:33
critics believe that evidence proves that the Church is not true, even if they are admittedly completely unfamiliar with LDS scholarly arguments for the Church
9:34
ironic since our critics often believe that members of the Church are the ones who are not open-minded
9:34
we can 4. Adding cognitions or information to validate the original belief.
9:35
when we find out more information and research it more, our original belief may, in fact, be correct.
9:36
example – the gold plates do not have to be pure gold in order to be called “gold” plates
9:37
common elements of those who leave the church for intellectual reasons…
9:37
* fundamentalist view of the scriptures or the role of prophets
9:38
* confusing rumors in the church for doctrine or revelation
9:39
sometimes we see things in black and white, when it may not be the case.
9:40
example – either there were horses in the Book of Mormon or there were not…
9:40
we need to use our brains as well as our hearts when we study the gospel
9:41
we don’t want to live with disillusions
9:42
* unrealistic expectations of prophets
9:42
* imposing our views on others
9:42
not every word spoken by a General Authority is inspired.
9:43
they are our leaders who give us guidance to the waters of truth, but they cannot make us drink
9:43
many of those who’ve left the church is over the issue about the role of a prophet.
9:44
[Comment From Christopher]
Bryce, so far much of Mr. Ash’s presentation seems to be in direct opposition to much of what you’ve been blogging lately. I hope we can get some of your own impressions of his presentation.
9:46
Chris – none of what Ash has said have I disagreed with. On the contrary, I recently had a discussion with my father about the geography of the Book of Mormon. He believed that since certain prophets had, on occasion, said certain things about New York that the geography had to occur there. I disagreed, and presented the same information about the role of prophets. But when the prophets and apostles repeatedly teach doctrines, we are not free to disregard them.
9:46
* confusing tradition with doctrine
9:48
Ash is talking about the same thing about BoM geography that I just noted. Book of Mormon geography has often been based on tradition, and not on evidences, research, etc., that we are discovering today.
9:49
Prophets can accept traditions of their day without it being a revelation from God.
9:49
[Comment From Matt W.]
This is awesome Bryce, thanks for using tech to make those of us unable to attend have a window
9:49
You’re welcome Matt.
9:49
* imposing our views on others
9:50
this is what I think many dissidents of the Church are involved in that I don’t think is right.
9:50
[Comment From BHodges]
For anyone who can’t follow the entire proceeding, I will post a summary of notes on Life On Gold Plates as well
9:51
[Comment From BHodges]
That way, latecomers can pick up in real time, read notes later if desired
9:51
[Comment From Matt W.]
Mike Ash is awesome, he wrote the best article I’ve ever read in support of evolution from an LDS perspective.
9:51
I’d be interested in reading that article by Mike Ash on evolution. I, personally, disagree with much of the evolution arguments in light of the gospel. But I can certainly learn more.
9:53
for example, in the Bible, writers often referred to the “whole earth,” when they meant their locality, not the entire world
9:53
[Comment From Matt W.]
It’s called “THe Mormon Myth of Evil Evolution” you can read it here http://www.mormonfortress.com/evolution.pdf
9:53
I’ll take a look at it. Thank you!
9:53
* unrealistic expectations of science and scholarship
9:54
DNA/Archaeology are too limited to damage the truth of the Book of Mormon. See the FAIR website for more info. www.fairlds.org
9:54
Bias
9:56
anti-Mormons clearly have bias too…
9:56
[Comment From Raven]
From your notes, Bryce, it looks like his book might be pretty interesting. I guess I’ll have to set aside my dislike of the cover design and buy it 🙂
9:57
Yes. 🙂 Maybe I can offer some design next time.
9:57
[Comment From James]
Ash’s presentation on Horses in the Book of Mormon at last years FAIR conference is posted on FAIR’s main page, and it is the best I’ve ever seen on the subject. It combines all facets of the issue into one great paper. It has pictures too!
9:57
[Comment From James]
Yes, the cover design has recieved some criticism, but the book is wonderful.
9:58
members of the Church can’t remain ignorant of LDS scholarship. This is something I have talked about before. Our challenge is to get the word out.
9:58
[Comment From Hans]
So tough to get work done and follow notes. I’ll try to keep following and check out other summaries later.
9:59
All of this will be available after the conference, too, permanently on this website.
10:00
Ash is now answering questions… If people just want to argue, then it is not worth defending the Church with them. It will go nowhere.
10:01
when should we inoculate a member? we should NOT throw out these things for shock value
10:01
let’s not be participants in damaging someone else’s testimony
10:01
we need to educate in a faithful context.
10:02
just airing dirty laundry gets us nowhere, and can do more damage than good.
10:02
[Note that some of these comments are my own, mixed with what Ash is saying. I will try to differentiate when I can.]
10:03
We should use our own minds, but we should not go around teaching things in opposition with what the prophets and apostles are teaching us.
10:04
Scott Gordon has also announced that there is a liveblogging commentary going on at http://www.fairblog.org/2008/08/07/fair-conference-day-1-open-thread/
10:04
the next presentation starts at 10:10am
10:05
it will be by Mark Wright, entitled, “Deification: Divine Inheritance and the Glorious Afterlife in the Book of Mormon and Ancient Mesoamerica.”
10:06
here is a photo of Mike speaking:
10:07 [Image] Mike Ash speaking.jpg 
10:07
I’m very interested in this next presentation by Mark Wright
10:09
I attended his presentation a couple months ago at the Olivewood Bookstore (www.olivewoodbooks.com), about Mesoamerica and the Book of Mormon. It was really great.
10:10
He pointed out Mesoamerican elements that he sees in the text of the Book of Mormon. Often, he said, we look for the the reverse, the Book of Mormon in Mesoamerica, which isn’t the same.
10:10
I believe Wright is doing his doctorate dissertation on the subject he will be presenting.
10:11
here is a little bio and picture of Mark Wright:
http://www.fairlds.org/conf08b.html#Wright
10:11
[Comment From Matt W.]
I’ve never heard of Mark Wright, Any CV on him?
10:12
his dissertation has to do with “divine kingship among the ancient Maya civilization.” A subject which is very interesting for temple studies.
10:18
title of presentation, “Deification: Divine Inheritance and the Glorious Afterlife in the Book of Mormon and Ancient Mesoamerica.”
10:19
Mark Wright is a Nibley fellow (scholarship?) by FARMS
10:19
Scott Gordon is introducing him
10:20
This is going to be good.
10:22
he’s not going to talk about geography in the Book of Mormon… he believes Mesoamerica is the right place
10:22
Deification – the doctrine that humans can become gods.
10:23
http://www.lds.org/museum/exhibit/images/d31_mr.jpg
Church Museum of Art…
10:27
sometimes we think in our modern context, when we need to think in ancient ways in order to truly understand what the ancients were saying.
10:27
gods or deities in Mesoamerican Studies = “Supernatural sentient beings that appear in sacred narrative”
10:29
Mesoamericans had a belief in distinct gods
10:29 [Image] Mark Wright speaking.jpg 
10:30
Book of Mormon describes distinct deities, just like the ancient Mesoamericans did.
10:31
we have different descriptions of these gods by the Mesoamericans as kings, a lamb, a rock, sun, etc.
10:31
there are also devil “deities”
10:32
the ancient Maya believed that there were celestial gods and underworld gods
10:32
Satan is called the “god of this world” in 2 Cor. – http://scriptures.lds.org/en/2_cor/4/4#4
10:33
the Mesoamericans believed in these underworld gods, but clearly did not worship them
10:33
“idol gods”
10:34
“God sitting upon his throne surrounded by other gods” – Mesoamerican sculpture depicts some of this (showing picture)
10:35
http://scriptures.lds.org/en/1_ne/1/8#8
10:35
Mesoamerican had a distinct Triad of deities
10:36
each locality had a different set of three gods, at least by name
10:36
The Palenque Triad…. but we don’t know their specific name, but we call them by their letter designation.
10:37
[Comment From austin s]
Does he address the fact that Lehi in that scripture was still in Jerusalem, not mesoamerica?
10:38
Austin, that is irrelevant since Nephi wrote the story when he was in the New World, and I believe it was Alma who also referenced it later, which shows that it was a tradition among those in the Book of Mormon who were in the New World.
10:39
Here is Alma referencing Lehi’s vision – http://scriptures.lds.org/en/alma/36/22#22
10:40
the king was anointed to become king. a number of enthronement rituals in order to become king, and therefore become a god after death.
10:41
rituals endowed the Mesoamerican ruler into a sacred person, or holy
10:41
the kings expected to be deified after death
10:42
they received the glory of the Sun god, although they didn’t believe that they replaced that god
10:43
[Comment From austin s]
Right, I can see the Alma reference being understood in a mesoamerican deity sort of context, I just don’t think Nephi would have been particularly influenced by interactions with a completely alien religion in the new world having been taught and lived in Jerusalem etc. I’m just interested to hear the whole story, I’m sure he has other scriptures. Thanks for all this, Bryce, btw.
10:44
I don’t understand Austin. What completely alien religion?
10:44
Do you like this liveblog?
Yes

 ( 100% )

No

 ( 0% )

Some

 ( 0% )

10:45
the rulers were intermediaries between the people and their deities
10:47
http://scriptures.lds.org/en/mosiah/2/10#10

King Benjamin would not have had to warn the people to not think of him as the deity, if some did not think of him as such.

10:47
[Comment From austin s]
Ah I guess he is arguing that the Nephites influenced mesoamerican religion, correct? I thought he was arguing that the mesoamericans who were already there had similar themes in their religion. That’s probably where the confusion came in.
10:48
burning of blood “incense” in a bowl as an offering to their deities
10:49
http://scriptures.lds.org/en/alma/34/13#13
10:50
Mesoamericans believe that they had a deity that had blood that could be sacrificed for the world
10:53
http://www.belizephonecard.com/freestuff/wallpaper/wpimages/maya_temples/tikal/tikal107.jpg

10:54
Something like this structure in Tikal could have served the same function as the tower that King Benjamin used to speak to his people
10:54
the ancients had beliefs in the distinct myths of creation, sacrifice and the anointed king. Las Pinturas Temple – San Bartolo Murals
10:56
one elite individual was responsible for the enthronement of the king. there are Mesoamerican art that depicts this.
10:56
[Comment From BHodges]
awesome that you can include the pictures
10:56
Yea, I like that ability too.
10:57
reading a text where it talks about one Mesoamerican ruler anointing and enthroning another ruler in mortality
10:57
this enthronement happened in the sacred buildings of the Mesoamericans
10:58
Altar Q, Copan Honduras
10:58
depicts one ruler passing the torch of kingship to another ruler
10:59
11:00
entire cities mentioned in Mesoamerican texts still cannot to be found by archaeologists
11:02
rulers received new names of deities
11:03
Book of Mormon describes that as we take on the name of Christ we can become like Him.
11:03
“sit down” – succession to the throne
11:03
“sitting down” is often referenced in the scriptures, and this is an enthronement image in heaven
11:03
[Comment From BHodges]
this is awesome
11:04
agreed!
11:04
[Comment From Hans]
can’t wait for the full text. i hope that he can include all of his pictures
11:05
Yea, I hope he includes his PowerPoint of his presentation when he publishes it.
11:05
[Comment From BHodges]
As children of the kingdom, we are joint-heirs with Christ. We are said to be sat with Him in the throne, inheriting all the Father hath. Among the classic Maya, the term for “seated” referring to an office are used, along with the concept of ascension and deification; as the Book of Mormon uses the concept of “sitting down” with the forefathers on thrones of glory.
11:06
http://www.utexas.edu/cofa/a_ah/dir/precol/images/83_tikal.gif
11:07
Tikal Stela 31
11:08
[Comment From Brad]
What was the commentary about whole cities not being found…?
11:08
He said that there was evidence among many Mesoamerican artifacts of an entire city that has still not been found anywhere
11:08
[Comment From Hans]
fascinating! also in light of Egyptian and Babylonian deification rituals for kings, it is amazing that nearly identical themes existed with the maya
11:09
[Comment From Brad]
But what was his point about that as it relates to the Book of Mormon and LDS theology?
11:10
There was something else in the texts that he was referring to… something about names I believe.
11:10
[Comment From BHodges]
Mark is showing that the concept of deification has impressive parallels in the Book of Mormon, which in turn parallel current LDS thought on deification
11:11
Q&A session now – there is a standard saying among Mesoamerican texts in which they often used “And it came to pass…”
11:12
[Comment From Brad]
I’m still lost as to the relevance/significance of the entire missing cities. How did that fact relate to the rest of the presentation?
11:12
he said that in passing.
11:14
man, he talks fast.
11:14
fascinating presentation. I look forward to the publishing of this one.
11:15
[Comment From BHodges]
it was an aside that basically said “take what i am saying with caution in regards to the archeology because it is still preliminary in terms of the “science.”
11:15
[Comment From Brad]
but you type fast! 🙂
11:16
next presentation is Margaret Young and Darius Gray – “Nobody Knows, the Untold Story of Black Mormons”
11:16
[Comment From Hans]
agree, that was great.
11:16
[Comment From Raven]
What a cool presentation! Looking forward to the published version.
11:16 [Image] Darius Gray 
11:17 [Image] Margaret Young 
11:17
[Comment From Raven]
I’ve heard that one (“Nobody knows…”) is supposed to be pretty great, too.
11:18
Bio of Darius Gray – http://www.fairlds.org/conf08b.html#Gray
11:18
Bio of Margaret Young – http://www.fairlds.org/conf08b.html#Young
11:19
[Comment From Brad]
are you going to have all the day’s evens in one live blog? It may be wise to break it into separate “sessions”, or whatever CoveritLive calls them.
11:19
yes, it will be all one liveblog. that is how CoveritLive does it.
11:20
Darius is talking about their presentation and how it has been given at many venues, and has been well-received in those places
11:20
It’s a video presentation.
11:22
Various interviews about their embracing of the gospel of Jesus Christ.
11:22 [Image] Nobody Knows video.jpg 
11:23
[Comment From Brad]
isn’t it a documentary?
11:23
yea… I guess
11:24
the questions that the gospel answers attracted them.
11:24
[Comment From Brad]
If it is the one I have heard about, they have submitted it to several film festivals and won awards.
11:24
Yes, it is the same one that has been submitted to film festivals.
11:25
interviewing with Marvin Perkins, and others, about the prophetic calling of Joseph Smith
11:26
1832 – Elijah Abel, from African descent, was baptized into the Church.
11:26
was ordained an Elder, and later a Seventy
11:28
He was given a patriarchal blessing by Father Smith. “thou hast been ordained an Elder, and will be protected from the power of the destroyer”
11:28
Jane Manning James
11:28
[Comment From Brad]
I believe his descendants were all given the priesthood…
11:29
they were welcomed by the prophet Joseph Smith and Emma, and were welcomed to live in their house.
11:29
[Comment From Brad]
which underscores that the restriction on the priesthood had to do with lineage
11:29
[Comment From Brad]
not skin color
11:29
[Comment From Brad]
http://www.blacklds.org/abel
11:31
[Comment From Brad]
for some reason, the Lord allowed his lineage to have the priesthood. According to blacklds.org, his son and grandson also received the priesthood
11:31
1964 – Darius Gray started meeting with the missionaries.
11:32
[Comment From Brad]
the rights of the priesthood have always been restricted by lineage, even in the OT (Levites, sons of Aaron, Jews, etc)
11:32
Darius’s mother did not want him to be part of, what she considered, a “racist” church
11:32
but Darius wanted to know more, and continued searching it out.
11:33
raised the question to the missionaries about the dark skin in the Book of Mormon
11:34
missionary responded, “the primary implication is that you won’t be able to hold the priesthood”
11:34
Darius thought they were hypocrites.
11:34
he totally rejected baptism.
11:35
he prayed about it, and received personal revelation that this was the restored gospel of Jesus Christ, and that he was to join
11:36
President Kimball – “I anticipate no major changes in the immediate future” when he became prophet.
11:37
President Kimball pondered these things intently…
11:37
He prayed in the temple with fervency, that something was extremely important to find out from the Lord…
11:38
when the revelation on the priesthood came, it opened up the dreams of those who believed but who did not have the priesthood.
11:39
“With great solemnity and seriousness, alone in the upper rooms of the temple, I offered my soul, and my efforts to go forward with the program… we said, Lord, we want only what is right.   We are   not making any plans…   We only want what thou dost want, and only when you want it, and not until.   And finally, we had the feeling, and the impressions from the Lord, that this was the correct thing to do, to make the gospel universal, to all worthy people.” – President Kimball
11:40
http://www.xmission.com/~research/central/plswk12.jpg
11:41
when Darius found out about the revelation he didn’t believe it at first…
11:42
he picked up the phone and called President Kimball…
11:42
he wasn’t there, but he was told that the revelation was true, and that it came from heaven
11:42
[Comment From Matt W.]
Darius Gray is my hero.
11:43
truth and reconciliation
11:45
http://mormonstories.org/top10toughissues/elijahabel.jpg
Elijah Abel
11:47
President Hinckley – “No man who makes disparaging remarks against another race can consider himself a true disciple of Christ nor in harmony with the church of Christ…”
11:49
the church has done so much good, that your hearts are right
11:49
-Pastor AME Church
11:50
“hell is hot, and eternity is long” – member didn’t want to go there 🙂
11:50
she felt the Spirit so clearly, and testified to her that the Church was true.
11:50
[Comment From BHodges]
I notice a huge flaw in this presentation.
11:51
[Comment From BHodges]
Namely, we don’t get to see the whole thing!
11:51
Right on!
11:51
I wonder when they will publish it, either online, or on DVD.
11:52
[Comment From BHodges]
I believe it is very preliminary as far as being released on dvd, but i think margaret has said it is something they would like.
11:53
many Saints received personal revelation that they should continue to be the “link” for their posterity in the Church…
11:53
[Comment From BHodges]
she posts blogs sometimes on By Common Consent, and is very easy to contact there, or even by email, from what i have seen
11:54
“the Spirit testified to me of the truthfulness of the gospel, and I could not go and look the Savior in His eyes and say, ‘I couldn’t do it, they said mean things'”
11:54
[Comment From Matt W.]
MArgaret posts at BCC, T&S, Mormon Mentality, occasionally. She responds to emails. My understanding is they basically had barely enough money to get the film released.
11:55
you mean “made”? I don’t think it’s been released.
11:56
“I would rather be a doorkeeper in the house of the Lord, than mingle among the top brass in the tents of the wicked.”
11:56
[Comment From Matt W.]
It’s been shown at about 10-15 festivals, so far as I know. Closest it came to me was Dallas… To far for me, sadly.
11:56
[Comment From Matt W.]
But I did mean made
11:58
if you had the power to change one thing, what would it be? “If I had the ability to be able to tell others about the truthfulness of the gospel, and what its done for me, truly, that’s what I would want” [paraphrased]
11:59
The End – (lengthy applause)
12:00
Q&A session
12:00
scriptural basis for denying the priesthood? McKay cited the PoGP as the only thing he know of.
12:01
Darius – Grant and McKay referred to it as a policy, not a doctrine, and that it would take revelation to change that policy
12:03
The Church doesn’t try to explain why Brigham Young denied Elijah Abel to receive his endowment… it was not the policy until 1847… the date is usually set at 1852… when Brigham Young died, the question was renewed, and John Taylor called a meeting… they talked about “what is our policy”… it was still a question until 1879, and wasn’t solidified until 1908
12:04
[Margaret Young]
12:05
we’re not going to try to explain why there was a ban
12:06 [Image] Margaret Young and Darius Gray.jpg 
12:07
Margaret Young and Darius Gray answering questions.
12:08
We are committed Latter-day Saints. We must read all the scriptures, and everything around it, to understand it. Also through the Spirit… [Darius]
12:08
when is the DVD coming out? They’ve been working on special features which are twice as long as the feature… a lot of material, interviews, etc.
12:10
they are working on everything… it takes time… they hoped it would be available today… but they are swamped and have only one editor. Possibly will be out before Christmas 2008. It will be announced on FAIR’s website.
12:10
end of questions
12:10
It’s lunchtime! We’ll see you soon.
12:11 [Standby]  We are on lunch. Be back at 1:15pm MDT.
1:13
Alright. We’re back.
1:13
The next presentation is by Brian Birch, Blake Ostler, and James Faulconer on “Philosophy and Mormonism” – a panel discussion
1:14
I must say, this liveblogging thing has worked out quite well so far. I’ve had some small difficulties, but mostly it’s been with the WiFi… I’ve got dropped off a couple times from the wireless internet access
1:16
see bios here – http://www.fairlds.org/conf08b.html
1:16
Daniel C. Peterson is moderating the discussion
1:18
here is Scott Gordon introducing the panel:
1:18 [Image] introducing panel discussion.jpg 
1:19
Peterson is introducing the discussion of philosophy in the Church
1:19
[Comment From Matt W.]
Sweet, this is the one I’m excited about
1:19
[Comment From Bill Hamblin]
Keep up the good work. I can attend FAIR indirectly from Oxford. Go tell him Bill Hamblin from Oxford says hi! I can’t open the photos however. More Barker vids will be up in a while.
1:20
Gotta love the “Hi” from Bill Hamblin in Oxford. Great videos of your interview with Margaret Barker, by the way!
1:20
[Comment From James]
The sound is coming in loud and clear through the FAIR live streaming
1:20
[Comment From James]
Much better than this morning
1:20
[Comment From James]
Thanks for the vids Bill!! Everyone around the bloggernacle is talking about them!
1:21
“the philosophies of man mingled with scripture” – the most important statement in the Church on the subject – Blake Ostler
1:21
[Comment From Hans]
too bad video is 1 fps
1:22
we do the best we can do…
1:23
when we stop and think deeply and carefully about something it is called philosophy – Ostler
1:23
but there are upsides and downsides
1:25
wow… I think some of this might be over my head… I’m going to have to study this one out on paper… Ostler talking about the existence and logical reason for evil
1:26
he’s read Summa Theologica fully in Latin – whoa
1:26
[Comment From KC]
I love Blake Ostler…he’s smarter than heck.
1:27
[Comment From Hans]
bryce, when can we expect teach yourself latin on your blog? we’re way behind
1:28
lol… I’d like to learn some Hebrew, actually… working on that currently
1:28
[Comment From Bill Hamblin]
Anyone who has read the entire Summa Theologica in Latin needs to watch more TV!
1:28
lol
1:29
one of the purposes of philosophy is in our dealings with each other
1:30
what is it about this religion that makes it so compelling to thinking people who make it the most precious thing in their lives, and devote their entire lives to it? our critics should consider this
1:31
what are the most important questions that we can ask?
1:31 [Image] James Faulconer 
1:31
Now to Faulconer
1:31
[Comment From Hans]
how long is the summa theologica
1:32
good question.
1:32
how long is it in Latin?
1:32
philosophy is the love of wisdom.
1:32
religion too seeks wisdom
1:32
[Comment From Hans]
even better question
1:39
we’re back…. WiFi went down for a few minutes… sorry
1:39
missed a few of Faulconer’s comments
1:39
we are to explain the “hope” that we have to others
1:40
“reason” has its origin in our relationship with others
1:41
reason is an appeal to the understanding of another person
1:42
we apologize, not for ourselves, but for our “hope” for something other than ourselves
1:42
[Comment From bill hamblin]
The Summa is a couple thousand pages long.
1:42
we apologize for our “hope” by bearing testimony
1:43
we also apologize through philosophy
1:44
not everyone needs to do philosophy… it is a kind of “disease”…. and it is incurable for those who have it.
1:44
[Comment From Hans]
i might as well start reading the talmud to make up for lost time then.
1:44
Society for Mormon Philosophy and Theology
www.smpt.org
1:45
[Comment From bill hamblin]
Does he mean apologize as “defend” or as “express regrets”
1:45
defend
1:45
now to Brian Birch
1:45
actually, Brian D. Birch, not the anti-Mormon Brian Birch…
1:45 [Image] Brian Birch 
1:46
how’s this photo, Brian?
1:46
[Comment From bill hamblin]
If you get a chance, go tell Dan Peterson that Bill Hamblin says hi from Oxford
1:46
will do!
1:47
he has enjoyed the articles from FAIR on a variety of subjects
1:47
the apologetic enterprise…
1:47
“Philosophical Musings on Mormon Apologetics” – title of his remarks
1:47
What is apologetics? apologia=a speech made in defense.
1:48
[Comment From BHodges]
Here Birch seems to be using apologetics in the sense of defending the Church from criticism.
1:49
apologetics = the defense by argument of Christian belief
1:50
bad apologetics = triumphalism, and sloppiness
1:51
logical fallacies = ad hominem & straw-man
1:51
ad hominem = attacking the person and not the argument
1:51
[Comment From Hans]
sloppiness?
1:51
bad people can make good arguments and good people can make bad arguments
1:51
we shouldn’t focus on the character of the person making the arguments
1:52
straw-man = attacks a position other than that which the other has
1:53
in ideal exchanges, we should be able to summarize accurately the other’s position with satisfaction
1:53
[Comment From BHodges]
this is brilliant
1:53
yes!
1:54
we should seek learning by study and also by faith
1:54
but how do we engage these two… we’ve been all over the map
1:54
[Comment From Hans]
a good introduction to apologetics
1:55
Elder Oaks essay on “Reason and Faith”
1:55
incorrigable conclusion = no argument could change the conviction of one’s conclusions
1:55
which conclusions should we accept? arguments which build faith, even if they are not the best arguments?
1:56
he agrees that the articles from FAIR and FARMS are very good, but the publisher is not the indicator of good argument
1:57
how do we know which argument is right? LDS rely on the Spirit, but so do some of our critics
1:57
[Comment From BHodges]
and other LDS too
1:58
one may be able to know something which is true without being able to show that it is true to others
1:59
the arguments in play don’t work in the traditional sense because the conclusion can change in light of revising premises
2:00
[i’ve had a few times when I’ve had to bear testimony and walk away… have you?]
2:00
[Comment From bill hamblin]
Overarching all of this discussion is the antecedent question of epistemology
2:01
the end
2:01
now to some questions and answers
2:01
[Comment From Matt W.]
true bill, it seems like they aren’t digging very deep at it though. I wonder why… Maybe time constraints?
2:02
why have you not lost faith when you’ve immersed yourself in philosophy? Faulconer, it is a false premise.
2:03
Ostler = there has been a great shift in the field of philosophy… it’s not all about “getting it right” with the teacher… sometimes faith is destroyed by philosophy
2:03
Birch = philosophy is the occasion for the struggle, but not the cause
2:04
“are you aware of what philosophy can do to someone in the church?!”
2:04
there is not an easy answer to the relationship between philosophy and faith
2:05
what is the value of philosophy to LDS? Ostler-science is a type of philosophy
2:05
[Comment From Matt W.]
philosophy is thinking deeply, faith is believing deeply. I don’t see the problem.
2:06
“tell me the answers so I can do good on the exam!” that’s not philosophy… the entire class can be given in questions… which can make it unsettling… it is ongoing conversation
2:07
[Birch]
2:07
[Comment From Hans]
not getting a straight answer, sounds like law school all over again
2:07
that’s philosophers for you! never a straight answer.. I think that’s by design
2:08
Faulconer = there are not necessarily final answers, but having the questions and the deep thought has value in and of itself
2:09
Ostler – fallacy of science give us answers, faith and religion don’t
2:09
it’s clear to see the error there… science changes all the time… it never has the final answers
2:10
[Comment From bill hamblin]
Next year you need to do a live web cam of the FAIR
2:12
they have a live audio stream this year, right now… but yes, I think next year they should do a full live web broadcast, using something like Mogulus (www.mogulus.com)
2:12
[Comment From Hans]
what about John Taylor’s statement that Philosophy is “fried froth”?
2:12
[Comment From Matt W.]
science is just another form of reasoning, like philosophy.
2:12
[Comment From Hans]
there is a webcam right now streaming from FAIR
2:12
they have a webcam?
2:13
I thought it was just going to be an audio stream
2:14
I think you can contact them and request the link/login to the stream at streaming@fairlds.org
2:15
[Comment From Hans]
yes, it is only 1 fps, but it is semi-decent
2:16
[Comment From Hans]
they said that they would bring a better webcam for Friday’s session
2:17
Ostler-we need to be able to learn from each other in apologetics
2:18
some very insightful comments by Ostler… I don’t think I could repeat it…
2:18
[Comment From Matt W.]
John Taylor was of course setting up philosophy as a certain characterization, where people think to hard and miss the mark. There is merit too such an idea, but sometimes, we don’t think hard enough also.
2:20
man… I’m glad I didn’t become a philosopher for a profession… I could have never done it… it takes me hours to formulate the ideas that they throw around… amazing
2:21
that was a very interesting discussion, even if we couldn’t get extremely deep into any issues per say… it was more about the relationship of philosophy with the Church, which is what it was supposed to be.
2:25
[Comment From Matt W.]
So all in all would you say it was more an apologetic for the use of philosophy as a legitimate tool in the church?
2:25
something like that… yes
2:26
I’m going to go say Hi to Br. Peterson for Bill Hamblin
2:33
[Comment From Matt W.]
k
2:33
[Comment From James]
I think it was weird presentation to give at an apologetics conference. Most of it was NOT about the role of philosophy in apologetics, either that or I totally missed the boat.
2:33
[Comment From bill hamblin]
Philosophy, as the medieval scholastic Thomas Aquinas said, should be the handmaiden of theology.
2:33
Dan Peterson says “Hi” to Bill!
2:34
next presentation is Jeffrey Bradshaw – “The Message of the Joseph Smith Translation: A Walk in the Garden”
2:34
[Comment From bill hamblin]
I suspect he said more than that. Put him on the keyboard!
2:35
lol!! I barely got to say hi… he was being rushed off the stage for the next presentation.
2:35 [Image] Jeffrey Bradshaw 
2:35
[Comment From bill hamblin]
Does he mean JST of the Bible?
2:35
umm… don’t know yet
2:36
bio – http://www.fairlds.org/conf08b.html#Bradwshaw
2:36
Book “In God’s Image and Likeness” by Bradshaw
2:37
the title is in honor of Hugh Nibley’s book on the papyri
2:37
[Comment From James]
Thats what I wanted to ask.
2:37
[Comment From James]
For those who don’t know, the webcam and the audio is working great right now.
2:37
The Book of Moses
2:38
First book of Joseph’s translation of the Bible
2:39
why did he need to do a translation?…
2:39
[btw, the title of the presentation was in honor of Nibley, not Bradshaw’s book]
2:40
The first portion of Genesis (1-24) received much more attention to Joseph
2:40
the patriarchs are in these chapters
2:41
it was the tutoring of Joseph Smith with the temple subjects that made these portions so important.
2:41
We don’t realize how important these sections are with our temple worship.
2:42
[much of this he says is in his book that I listed at the beginning]
2:43
the revelation of 132 came in the early years of the translation of the Bible but was not published until 1843
2:44
Moses 1, Moses 5-8, contain the most interesting things about the temple… but he will focus on Moses 2-4… the Garden
2:45
“the architecture of the tabernacle is a reconstruction of a vision of the creation” Margaret Barker
2:45
[Comment From James]
fascinating material!
2:45
the divisions, veils, shewbread, luminaries, birds (cherubim), etc.
2:45
[Comment From bill hamblin]
cool
2:45
[Comment From bill hamblin]
Is his book out yet?
2:45
I couldn’t find it on Amazon… not sure
2:46
the Garden of Eden was a natural temple, a reflection of the heavenly temple
2:47
man was created in the garden, through the fall he passed out of the “temple” through the cherubim, and the atonement takes us back
2:47
tree of life
2:48
the tree is an anthropomorphic symbol – stands for Christ – Catherine Thomas
2:48
Barker see evidence that the tree of life was symbolized inside the Holy of Holies, not just outside
2:49
tree of life as the olive tree
2:49
the date palm
2:50
showing a picture of trees, cherubim, 4 streams, etc.
2:51
I had no idea this presentation was going to be so much about the temple.. this is great
2:52
God gestures toward the tree as he takes Adam by the arm… Eve raises her arm in consent
2:52
“God Creating Eve, God Instructing Adam and Eve, late twelfth century”
2:53
the foundation stone
2:53
the center of creation
2:53 [Image] Bradshaw with the Tree of Life.jpg 
2:54
symbolism of the sacred center… the circle symbolizes heaven, the square symbolizes earth
2:55
Dore’s L’Empyree
2:55
http://rosaecruz.no.sapo.pt/MEcclesia/symbols/Dore-empyrean.jpg
2:56
circles… everywhere.. Christ stood in the center of the midst of the children, and the angels came down and encircled them… adults on the outside of them, and the profane on the outside of them… in Book of Mormon
2:57
http://scriptures.lds.org/en/3_ne/17/24#24
2:57
two trees in the Garden
2:58
three zones of sacredness within Eden
2:59
outer courtyard (telestial), Garden of Eden (terrestrial), Tree of Life (Holy of Holies)
2:59
Ephrem’s conception of Eden
2:59
color of the tree of life was “like the Sun”
3:00
tree of knowledge is the knowledge of divine things
3:00
the tree of life was the locus of God’s throne
3:00 [Standby]  back in a sec
3:01
back.
3:02
Manichaean wall-painting from Bazaklik, East Turkestan
3:02
I’m going to really have to go over this again… there is a lot of stuff here.
3:02
[Comment From BHodges]
good grief, this is way too much to blog notes on
3:02
talk about curtains and screening of the tree of life
3:03
[tell me about it… he talks fast too]
3:03
Why did Satan encourage eating of the forbidden fruit?
3:04
he had his own motives… he wanted them to eat of the tree of life directly after the tree of knowledge… but if they had, there would have been no probationary state.
3:04
[Comment From bill hamblin]
So, what part of “we need pictures” don’t you understand???!?!?!?!?!?
3:04
lol… I’ll try to do more.
3:06
[Comment From bill hamblin]
Type with your fingers, take pictures with your mouth.
3:06
lol…
3:06
This one’s for you Bill:
3:06 [Image] Tree of Life.jpg 
3:06
Tree of Life
3:07
Talk about the serpent in the Garden
3:07
three mysterious (secret) words…
3:08
Margaret Barker – the two trees seemed identical
3:08
to Eve
3:09
Sacred Tree on the Apron of Charlemagne
3:09
http://www.bmaf.org/fckeditor/charlemagne.jpeg
3:10
ancient coin which shows Charlemagne wearing an apron with tree of life imagery
3:11
[Comment From BHodges]
brilliant!
3:11
they have not only touched the tree of life, but they have merged with it.
3:11
[Comment From BHodges]
where are u getting the images
3:11
Google Images… unfortunately, I can’t see the name on some of these images to look them up
3:12
the screen on my side is too low
3:13
funny… Bradshaw is always confusing the Book of Moses and the Book of Mormon…
3:13
Egyptian scenes of passage through doorways
3:14
the angel who becomes mortalized loses their heavenly garment, and receives the garment of the skin
3:14
this presentation is packed…
3:15
The Quest of Seth for the Oil of Mercy
3:15
(1351-1360)
3:16
almost now to the end of our walk through the Garden
3:16
closer to the olive tree or date palm? Both
3:17
The garden had 3 trees… life, knowledge, and the olive tree (only after the Savior was provided for Adam)
3:18
trees in both the Holy of Holies and one before the veil, the later representing the Savior.
3:18
The Clothing of Adam and Eve
3:19
http://www.wutsamada.com/wmblake/angelodp.jpg
3:19
by William Blake
3:19
the end…. that was incredible!
3:20
I feel like I just sat through a recitation of “The Gate of Heaven”… amazing
3:20
[Comment From BHodges]
brilliant. What a presentation
3:20
Q&A – is the JST restoration of the original text, or addition?
3:20
Moses 1 is a revelatory expansion of those texts
3:20
[Comment From Guest]
Well, there’s another book I’ll have to read.
3:21
[Comment From Bill Hamblin]
That was me.
3:22
[Comment From BHodges]
what is the name of the book, aye?
3:22
[Comment From BHodges]
hey if it isn’t mr. bill hamblin!’
3:22
yea.. he’s been here for some time now 🙂
3:22
sexual connotations of the tree and fruit? interesting..
3:23
[Comment From Bill Hamblin]
That’s DR. Bill to you.
3:24
[Comment From BHodges]
haha joseph fielding smith i think and others really condemned the sexual thing too
3:24
[Comment From BHodges]
DR. Bill, your name says “Comment from “Bill Hamblin” sorry. I will call you by the name “Bobbafett” now
3:25
[Comment From BHodges]
*Bobafett
3:25
His book “In God’s Image and Likeness,” which has a lot of this stuff in it, Bradshaw has slated for publication by Greg Kofford books in late 2009
3:26
why hasn’t the JST been canonized?
3:26
practical reasons? footnotes? clarifications only?
3:26
[Comment From BHodges]
woohoo! i hope they get a better editor
3:26
[Comment From Bill Hamblin]
I just checked. It is not on Amazon yet.
3:29
we only have second-hand and third-hand accounts of the method of the translation
3:29
I had no idea his presentation was going to be about the temple… that was great.
3:29
now for a snack break!
3:30 [Standby]  back in a bit
3:47
And we’re back.
3:48
Larry Poulsen – “Book of Mormon Geography: Convergence of Culture and Geography”
3:48
[Comment From Hans]
they are attaching the power point on the live stream
3:48
Here’s an dated picture of him:
3:49 [Image] Larry Poulsen 
3:49
bio – http://www.fairlds.org/conf08b.html#Poulsen
3:49
Why geography?
3:50
a map of Palestine gives a sense of assurance that the events of the Bible took place in a real place among real people
3:52
people feel like they need a map of the Book of Mormon
3:53
Like this one for the New Testament:
3:53
3:53
Zelph story…
3:54
[Comment From Guest]
Alas, it’s late in Oxford. I’m off to bed.
3:55
Bye Bill! Thanks for stopping by!
3:56
This liveblog will be available for all after the fact if you want to check it out later.
3:57
there have been over 150 models of Book of Mormon geography that have been published… they are available in the wiki of FAIR’s website
3:57
Sorenson’s “An Ancient American Setting for the Book of Mormon” was a landmark however, which used many textual details in the BoM
3:58
Poulsen wants to show convergences between cultures, the text, etc., in geographic studies
4:01
Here is a fuzzy photo of Poulsen’s model of BoM geography:
4:01 [Image] Poulsen’s map.jpg 
4:02
Directional Concepts
4:02
up down, east south,
4:02
Modern map oriented – north and south, east and west
4:03
Ancient orientation – up hill down hill
4:04
Precolumbian Aztec Map, relationships between places stays the same, but it is not an exact location like our modern maps
4:05
Concept vs. Modern vs. Ancient
4:05
Mesoamerican concept used sunrise/sunset, on the left/on the right, up and down
4:06 [Standby]  The host is placing this live blog into Standby Mode.
4:07
back… Poulsen is describing a compass rose (modern vs. Mesoamerican)
4:11
the ancients had quite a different paradigm of directions than we do today
4:12
here is our modern compass rose overlaid with the Mesoamerican compass rose:
4:12 [Image] Poulsen’s compass.jpg 
4:12
there are 378 references to direction in the Book of Mormon
4:14
39 north plus northward, 27 south plus southward, 19 east plus eastward, 16 west plus westward
4:14
showing a map of the quarters of the land of Mesoamerica
4:15
there is a sea in each of the quarters
4:15
the 4 seas… north, south, east, west… mentioned in the BoM
4:15
the land was surrounded by water
4:16
Book of Mormon Convergences:
* Limhi’s Search Party
* Destruction of Ammonihah
* Amilicite Nephite Battle
4:19
sorry for the delay… I’ve lost WiFi like 5 times now…
4:20
so, I think the convergences that Poulsen is talking about is different scriptures in the Book of Mormon that talk about the same localities
4:21
assumptions:
1. King Limhi assumes that the records contain the history of the people that built the ruins
4:22
I’m having trouble following Poulsen’s thesis…
4:23
2. The search party assumed that the ruins were from the destruction of the city of Zarahemla
4:26
why did the Limhi’s party not find the land of Zarahemla?
4:27
now Poulsen is showing a map of where he thinks the “narrow strip of wilderness” was, the western wilderness, land of Zarahemla, land of many waters, land of the Jaredites (Desolation), East Sea, West Sea…
4:28
he thinks they chose the wrong river
4:28
satellite map of Central America where he thinks these locations were
4:30
something like this:
4:30
http://www.earthslot.org/gallery_images/central_america_preview.jpg
4:31
Poulsen thinks that most of the BoM lands took place towards the top, on the left and below the Yucatan.
4:34
Here is another fuzzy photo:
4:34 [Image] poulsen’s map2.jpg 
4:35
[wishing that my cell phone took better pictures…]
4:37
I wonder if we’ll ever know, positively, whether these places are the actual BoM locations in Central America… would the Lord allow that? or would it take away our faith?
4:38
these are my comments… pondering on Poulsen
4:40
what does all this mean? I suppose it gives another plausible model for BoM geography
4:40
some of it does look intriguing
4:41
[Comment From BHodges]
i like his overhead views showing the land of many waters, and his idea on why the search party for zarahemla was lost
4:42
yea.. I can see some interesting research there
4:43
He can see multiple points of convergence between Central America geography and the text of the Book of Mormon.
4:43
Q&A
4:44
how could the Hill Cumorah be in Central America when JS’s plates were found in New York?
4:45
Moroni had some 35 years to travel away from the Hill Cumorah before burying the plates if you read the text closely
4:46
http://scriptures.lds.org/en/morm/6/6
4:46
[Comment From BHodges]
sounds like we have some bom geo fundies in the crowd
4:48 [Standby]  The host is placing this live blog into Standby Mode.
4:51
Poulsen doesn’t think we will probably ever have conclusive proof of BoM archaeology or geography… I think that is by divine design
4:52
the next presentation is Ugo Perego – “Joseph Smith’s DNA Revealed: New Clues from the Prophet’s Genes”
4:52 [Image] Ugo Perego 
4:53
bio – http://www.fairlds.org/conf08b.html#Perego
4:54
he’s got a good Italian accent
4:55
Genealogy + DNA = accuracy
4:55
DNA adds a level of understanding to what we know by other means
4:58
he’s been involved in a project to link DNA to genealogy, and to use DNA to help people discover their genealogy
4:59
we’ve traced Joseph Smith’s genealogy back to Robert Smith, in 1599 or 1626
5:00
“genealogy and biology… two things that will put you to sleep right away…”
5:02
finding the Joseph Smith DNA marker among his descendants… something hard to do
5:03
by taking the identical markers in descendants, you can find the marker of Joseph Smith Jr.
5:04
“I’m glad we didn’t find a “milkman” marker..” this guy is good
5:07
investigating the alleged children of Joseph Smith from his plural wives… he’s studied five of them so far
5:08
Moroni Llewellyn Pratt
5:11
[Comment From BHodges]
In Brodie’s No Man Knows My History she speculates that he is JS’s son. B. Dec. 7, 1844 so he could be a descendent. Fourth child of Parley Pratt. A descendent of Moroni contqacted Perego and said he thinks he may be a descendent so they tested his DNA and made the comparison.It does not match.
5:12
Moroni Llewellyn Pratt is not a descendant of JS Jr. Parley P. Pratt was his ancestor.
5:16
[Comment From BHodges]
haha this guy is a joker
5:16
[Comment From BHodges]
he said this is a “hobby,” which seems like a very tedious hobby! to each his own!
5:16
serious hobby!
5:21
still detecting if alleged children are Joseph’s
5:22
Buell
5:22
Not a match!
5:23
correct that page in your copy of Fawn Brodie’s biography too…
5:24
many thousands of people are wondering if they are descendants of Joseph Smith, and this gives us an opportunity to tell them.
5:24
Mosiah L. Hancock?
5:25
a descendant had a professionally done Y-DNA marker done…
5:26
and framed it… where do people find the time?
5:27
Not a match!! Not a descendant of Joseph Smith Jr.
5:27
Zebulon Williams Jacobs also not a match
5:27
George Algernon Lightner?
5:28
Where did Joseph Smith Jr.’s ancestry come from in England?
5:30
Smith is the most common surname
5:30
Robert was also one of the most common first names
5:33
where did he come from?
5:37
others with similar DNA – 35 from Ireland, 12 from Scotland, 8 from England, 2 from Denmark
5:38
So is Joseph Smith Jr.’s lineage Irish?
5:39
the marker is mostly found in North-west Ireland and Lowland Scotland
5:42
DNA evidence indicates that Joseph Smith Jr.’s ancestry goes back to Ireland, but probably with a different surname.
5:44
I give Ugo the award for the funniest presentation… 4 stars… very interesting stuff too.
5:45
We want to know everything we can about Joseph Smith Jr. Now we know something about his DNA/Genetic profile
5:46
[Comment From Brad]
What is he using for the “control” DNA to verify these people are/are not descendants?
5:46
[Comment From Brad]
DNA from clothes? Where did he get a DNA sample of JS/
5:47
you can compare DNA from known descendants… if there is a match in the Y chromosome, then they are also a descendant.
5:47
very interesting presentation
5:49
seems like there is not as many descendants as some of our critics like to allege.. they love to show Joseph as a real womanizer…
5:50
if you have questions, write ugo@smgf.org or visit www.SMGF.org
5:52
[Comment From Brad]
but the problem is there are all these people claiming to be descendants, how does he know which are really descendants to analyze their dna?
5:52
[Comment From Brad]
What’s up with all the “.” lines?
5:53
well, I think there must be some that we know are descendants..

the “.” are an artifact of CoveritLive… sometimes the software is one line behind what I am sending, so I type the “.” lines to flush them out of the system…

5:54
well… that’s it folks… great day of presentations.
5:54
amazing presentations… loved them all.
5:55
tomorrow morning we start with Ron Esplin on The Joseph Smith Papers. I’m excited to hear all the presentations tomorrow.
5:56
I hope this liveblog was beneficial to you. We’ll do the same thing tomorrow. Same time, same place. See you then.
5:57 [Standby]  To resume Friday morning at 9:00am MDT.
8:01



Posted in: Tidbits Tagged: apologetics, bloggernacle, blogging, conference, fair, online, websites

New TempleStudy.com Store!

July 19, 2008 by Bryce Haymond 2 Comments

I’ve built an online store for TempleStudy.com using Amazon.com, and today is its grand opening!  I did this primarily for three reasons:

  1. Readily available Temple-related Products:  All the products that I’ve been able to find that have to do with LDS temples or ancient temples from Amazon.com I have individually selected and gathered together, sorted, and categorized.  They include temple products from many categories including books (44 items), home & garden (191 items), office (18 items), toys & games (29 items), music (22 items), apparel (8 items), jewelry (32 items), DVD (6 items), and miscellaneous (26 items).  If you are looking for a temple-themed book, tie tack, stationery, photograph, music, game, or other such item, the TempleStudy.com store is a great place to start looking because I’ve already narrowed down the search for you.  The store itself currently includes a total of 376 temple-related products, but there are also many more products available from the “Listmania!” or “Similar Items” links on the right-hand side of the store which change and rotate automatically as you browse the store.
  2. No Anti-Mormon Material: You can browse the entire TempleStudy.com store without a worry of running across any critical propaganda, which can often become a distraction from the positive, faith-promoting material that you’re looking for, and many times it is hard to detect from the cover or description alone.  I have hand-picked every item here, and have filtered out all of that diversion.  Have peace of mind when you are looking for just the right temple product.  Note, however, that I can’t choose what appears in the Listmania! or Similar Items lists.
  3. Supporting TempleStudy.com:  A portion of each sale from this store will go to help support TempleStudy.com.  [Read more…]
Posted in: General Authorities, Scholarship, Tidbits Tagged: book, buy, DVD, hugh nibley, margaret barker, matthew brown, music, online, products, purchase, scholar, store, websites

Poll: TempleStudy.com Magazine?

July 16, 2008 by Bryce Haymond 4 Comments

If the posts on TempleStudy.com were also reproduced in a monthly printed periodical, would you purchase a subscription?

  • Depends on cost (39%, 36 Votes)
  • No (37%, 34 Votes)
  • Yes (17%, 16 Votes)
  • Maybe (8%, 7 Votes)

Total Voters: 93

Loading ... Loading ...

Please let me know your thoughts in the comments section.

Posted in: Tidbits Tagged: blogging, magazine, media, online, websites

Added ShareThis to TempleStudy.com

June 26, 2008 by Bryce Haymond Leave a Comment

I have added a new feature to TempleStudy.com.  It is called ShareThis.  This is a really great tool for sharing things about the temple that you read here with your friends, family, coworkers, associates, ward members, and anyone else you might like to pass along these articles to.  Each article now has a little green icon with the words “ShareThis” at the bottom of every post.  Clicking on this icon will allow you to share TempleStudy.com articles via:

  • Social Web – share or bookmark the article on Facebook, Digg, del.icio.us, Technorati, StumbleUpon, Google Bookmarks, and a host of other social bookmarking sites.
  • Post – post the article directly to your profile or blog on Facebook, Blogger, WordPress, Twitter, LiveJournal or others.
  • Send/Email – share the post with others directly by email, SMS (cell phone text message), instant message MySpace friends, or instant message AIM friends.

I hope you find this new tool useful, and that you will help spread the word about TempleStudy.com and help others learn more about the LDS temple.

Posted in: Tidbits Tagged: discussion, family, friends, google, online, sharethis, social bookmarking, talk, websites
« Previous 1 2 3 Next »

About TempleStudy.com

This blog is dedicated to the exemplary LDS (Mormon) scholar Dr. Hugh Nibley, whose landmark temple studies have strengthened the faith of many. Read more on About page. Email me. Click on the widget in the lower-right corner of the window to chat with me.

Support TempleStudy.com

Recent Comments

  • Miguel David Gedo on The Black Robes of a False Priesthood
  • ellen north on Pondering the Temple Experience Through Scripture
  • Corey on Who were the Shepherds in the Christmas Story?
  • Lori allred on Creed Haymond Story of the Word of Wisdom, in His Own Words
  • Aleta G on Homeward Bound: Interpretations of Marta Keen Thompson’s Music

Recent Posts

  • ThyMindOMan.com – Exploring the Mind’s Relationship to God
  • Videos of 2014 Temple on Mount Zion Conference Now Available for Free Viewing
  • Gratitude Precedes Zion
  • Official Church Video on Temple Garments and Robes
  • The Temple on Mount Zion 2014 Conference

Categories

  • Announcements
  • Artifacts
  • Church History
  • Favorites
  • General Authorities
  • Practices
  • Scholarship
  • Temples Today
  • Texts
  • Tidbits
  • Uncategorized

Archives

  • April 2017
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • February 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • December 2011
  • October 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008

Blogroll

  • Adventures in Mormonism
  • Believe All Things
  • Free Temple Photos Blog
  • Heavenly Ascents
  • Latter-Day Commentary
  • LDS Temples Photo Blog
  • Leen Ritmeyer – Archeological Design
  • Lehi’s Library
  • Millennial Star
  • Mormanity
  • Mormon Insights
  • Mormon Mysticism
  • Pronaos
  • Sacred Symbolic
  • Strong Reasons
  • Temple Photos Blog
  • The Seer Stone
  • Things Unutterable
  • Visions of the Kingdom

Links

  • Barry Bickmore: Temple in Early Christianity
  • Bruce Porter’s Temple Articles
  • BYU Students of the Ancient Near East (SANE)
  • FAIR Wiki
  • FAIRLDS: Mormon Research
  • FARMS: Mormon Scholarship
  • Jeff Lindsay: Temples and Masonry
  • Jesus Christ
  • LDS Church News
  • LDS Church Temples
  • LDS Temple Fine Art – Robert Boyd
  • LDS Temple Photography – Aaron Barker
  • LDS Toolbar.com
  • LDS Toolbar.net
  • LDS.org
  • LDS.org Temples
  • Mormon Church Temples
  • Mormon Conferences
  • Mormon Monastery
  • Mormon Temple Ceremony
  • Mormon Temple Ceremony
  • Mormon.org
  • Temple Prints Fine Art Photography
  • Temple Studies Group
  • The Temple Institute

Copyright © 2025 Temple Study.

Omega WordPress Theme by ThemeHall